While I love that Breaking Points offers two perspectives from people who consider themselves as members of opposing parties, the show has increasingly felt like it's pushed opinions on most topics as joint between Krystal and Saagar. It doesn't feel like there are many actual "breaking points" between them. Is this due to a general convergence of ideology or the stories you choose to cover (and not covering stories that may show a greater divide between hosts)?
Hello. Big fan. You guys are the Grim Reaper's of media. Using your scythe to mow down the lies and omitted truths of the lame poseur media. My question is, do you guys exchange Christmas gifts. If you do, what did you give each other in the past or if you dare say, what are you giving each other this year? I wish you guys health and success for the new year. Death to false media.
To go along with Sagaar's Australia story: Imagine a situation where your doctor tells you we can't submit paperwork for your vaccine exemption bc/we're afraid of the liability from the government, but we also refuse to give you the vaccine because your clear history of allergies to the components of the vaccine makes it too dangerous. But hey, maybe you can find another doctor that's willing to risk killing you with the vaccine... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qA0wZD0iPw On the one hand, having a govt healthcare system allows a country to mobilize against the pandemic better, but on the other hand, allowing the govt to control medicine leads to nightmare situations like this....