Donor/Subsciber Influence
How can viewers be sure that donations and subscriptions couldn't be used to influence what is covered on Breaking Points? For my own reasons, I currently trust that donor and subscriber input has no major influence over the show's content. I, personally, would be able to spot warning signs of a compromise, because my observation skills are second only to my humility, however, not everyone has that skill to rely on. It would be nice to have a recorded response to this concern, at a time when the trust is there, to refer back to if we ever find ourselves questioning the integrity of the show due to sussy behaviors. P.S. If you choose not to answer this question, I'm going to cancel my subscription ;)
Wilson/Biden Comparison
Saagar, given your interest in WW1, wonder if you've given this some thought. I don't think Biden has suffered strokes like Wilson did, but I do think his mental and physical capacities are diminished. I think there is plenty going on in the White House that doesn't include him, but not sure it's an organized effort like Edith Wilson implemented when her husband could no longer function, which creates the conflicting messages/leaks. What do you think? Thanks to you both for the continued hard work. Sean O'Rourke